Here are some notes to help you understand the graphs completely. The score labeled "weight" (left of iPhone 6) means the highest possible score. It also is the level of importance to me (for that criteria). The higher the weight score in each criteria means it matters more in the total. For example, the cameras were not so important, but the battery life matters a lot to me. Although the Moto X 2nd gen. was a great phone, I removed it from my research because it is unavailable on Sprint.
Data like price might change over time. I plan on updating this segment in a new post for next year's smartphones.
If you click on a graph, it will lead you to the product page of the wining product in that category.
I chose the cheapest option from 16GB. Some of these phones weren't available in that size, so I chose the next option up.
I favored the phones with removable batteries. The phones without removable batteries also got zeros.
The more RAM your device has, the faster and smoother it will run. The iPhone 6 and 6 plus both had 1GB of RAM.
I thought the Galaxy S5 would win, because the
camera is the best and the price is rather low. But in the end, the LG G3 ended
up winning.
The results from Table F show that the LG G3 won by
0.65. The results from Table J show that LG G3 won by 0.11 of a point. The LG
G3 came on top in both tables. As I quote from The Verge, “The G3’S greatest strength
is its lack of weakness.” It had no outstanding features, except the
inexpensive cost of the phone.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for posting a comment, it will be reviewed and then posted shortly.